Building a World

I’m struggling with world building right now. I’m writing a set of linked novellas, all set in a world with magic, but it’s a world that used to be like ours is. A catastrophic change happened, ushering in magic and eliminating certain other things (like Starbucks).

Just at a time that I was feeling discouraged at my ability to create a coherent world and add the right details, I read Mistborn by Brandon Sanderson. Sanderson is famous. He was tapped to finished the endless Wheel of Time saga; he is adored by writers and fans alike, and reviews of Mistborn trumpeted the wonderful world-building. To be fair, several reviews quickly followed those laudatory statements us with things like, “Well, it’s not exactly world-building, but his descriptions are atmospheric!”

Since Sanderson is seen as an expert of world-building, and especially the creation of magical systems, I found I was reading the book in a questioning mode. First of all, I enjoyed the book. This is not a review. I have written a review and it will post at Fantasy Literature. This post here is in the nature of a study.

I’m also aware that Mistborn is the first book of three, and it’s likely that many of these questions will be answered in the subsequent books.

Mines? Refineries? Foundries?

Sanderson’s magical system revolves around metals. Sanderson’s use of magical metals is innovative (if unintentionally funny sometimes). In Mistborn, one mine, of one metal that seems unique to Sanderson’s world, is mentioned and is quite important to the plot. Still, the magical people use other metals for power; copper, gold, and tin for instance. They also use alloys. There must be mines, smelting plants, refineries, and foundries, but we see and hear nothing of this. One noble house is responsible for running the magical mine; I would guess that lesser houses would be given charge of the copper, tin, etc… it’s never discussed. It wouldn’t matter, except that a large part of the plot involves bringing down the noble houses.

  • Where do they get their metal from?
  • How do they transport it?
  • How/where do they refine it?
  • The underground magicians, the allomancers, use metals all the time. Why doesn’t the Lord Ruler get a better grip on it? Make it harder to get?

Is there an economy?

Of course there is an economy, but we don’t see how it works. Mention is made of certain denominations of coins, but the currency is never demonstrated, because no one ever buys food, or a horse, or a pair of shoes, onstage. Basically, the coins exist only as magical props for the allomancers. Noble houses have to worry about “contracts;” and becoming impoverished; how do they make their money?

The coins are made of metal; the allomancers use metal as a source of their power. Why doesn’t the Lord Ruler go to a paper money system so he can control the metals?

The real economy seems to be a slave-based one, where 90% of the population, called skaa, are either serfs on plantations in the country, or factory workers in the city. (And what is made in those factories? And who runs them? The nobles, clearly, but which houses, and why? Does the capital city have trade partners? We never know.)

Just who are the nobles, anyway?

Out in the countryside, nobles run plantations that grow “crops.” I don’t know what the crops* are, except we do know that people eat lots of barley, and some vegetables. What are the crops? How are they harvested and shipped? Where are they shipped? The nobles out in the countryside are not the same families as the “great houses” who have keeps in the capital. That baffles me completely. Wouldn’t it be more likely that  you’d have your “city house” to stay close to the political action, but you’d send your second son or unlucky brother/cousin, out to the sticks to maintain the plantations?

What do the nobles do?

In the story, they have parties. We know this because the main character is sent in disguised as a young noblewoman, in order to get the latest gossip. They party, they scheme against one another. That isn’t enough. It’s troubling, when toward the end of the book, the main character, who is the impostor noblewoman, makes a comment about “going to balls on the weekend.” The weekend? The nobles have a workweek? Why?

Does it matter, really? After all, if the book is engrossing and fun, why do I care? Well, part of it is the length. If this were a romp at 345 pages I’d probably let it go. Mistborn weighs in at 643 — more than enough space to answer some of these questions.

*

Anyway, I finished the book having enjoyed the story, but feeling no more inspired or encouraged to address all my world-building headaches. I suppose, though, that it did give me a list of questions I have to answer. A long list. And that’s just… great.

*

*I know you’re thinking, “Geez, Marion, don’t be so picky. They’re crops, okay?” But it’s not okay. The sky is covered with a constant layer of ash, and the plants have changed color from green to shades of yellow and red, so what are they growing?

 

This entry was posted in Thoughts about Writing. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Building a World

  1. Chad Hull says:

    This if fun! It’s been years since I read this series, but at the time I enjoyed it for what it was. Do you have plans to read the rest of the series?

    I do remember the apathy of the Lord Ruler and the general state of neglect for his country is all explained.

    I think it’s a very good comment you make about the length of Sanderson’s work. He rambles a bit (okay, a lot) and I do remember thinking that every book in the series could have been two hundred pages shorter.

    I’ve no answers in regards to world building but I’d like to share my feelings as a reader in hopes that it may help you get back to writing. I can’t stress enough how much I hate world building. Stories are about characters and their conflict. Setting can play into this as well, but I read to engage with characters; to watch them suffer or rock out.

    Even in a story like Dune where the setting is perhaps the main character and so unique it was the characters that kept me reading. I was attached the people in the story: not the planet. Lolita could have taken place on Mars and the story would still be just as memorable. The Fault in Our Stars would be still be gorgeous if it happened underwater to mer-people.

    I’ve always felt story and characters trump setting, or world building, any day. That is however just my opinion and I’m aware you may not agree. I think a lot of fantasy writers become self indulgent in their quest for perfect or unique/amazing world building. As it a reader it’s not important to me, so why is the author going on and on about it? Whenever this happens in a book I’m reading and I get frustrated I say out loud, “Just go to Narnia and have your adventure already!”

    Tell me your story and let me see the people who are involved. If you give a bit of your world along the way even better. Write the parts of your story you do know; fill in the blanks later. Upon completion of writing what you do know you may not even see the need to fill in the blankets. Particularly if you’re stuck, I’d say skip the world building and jump to your story. That’s the part I wanna read anyway 🙂

  2. Chad Hull says:

    Oh, and I love the look of the new site!

  3. Marion says:

    Hey, Chad! Long time no see!

    I intend to read the next two books without question and I’ve already ordered them. I think a lot (not all) is explained. Some of it is hinted at in the first book; clearly the Lord Ruler is hoarding the magic metal for some purpose, and he does say they don’t know what he is “doing” for them — present tense, not past. I’m sure we’re going to find out (quickly!) in books two and three just what that was.

    Yes, characters and conflict are the big draws for me, too, but if you are going to imagine a world, I do think it needs to be coherent. I tend to yawn through the books that are only world building and magical systems, and I had a little bit of trouble with Sanderson’s characters as types for that reason. Fortunately, there was enough action that it didn’t make me set down the book.

  4. Marion says:

    I’m pretty happy with it too. I was scared to change anything! But then I just went for it.

    I’ll have to get over to your site and check in soon! I miss your observations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *