TV Tuesday: Pandora, on the CW.

Pandora airs on the CW at 8:00 pm Tuesdays. It’s aimed at a younger demographic than the CW’s DC Comics Universe Shows, Roswell, New Mexico, or those tween/millennial remakes of nighttime soaps like Dynasty. I’d guess that Pandora’s target age group is 14-18. On the other hand, I’m watching it, kind of.

The Premise:  This is a boarding-school show, like the Harry Potter books and movies, or The Magicians. Pandora is set in a science-fictional universe rather than a magical one, and the school is Earth’s Space Academy (a low-budget Star Fleet Academy.)

Jacqueline—or Jax—is the lone survivor when her extra-terrestrial colony, New Portland, is destroyed by mysterious attackers. Jax goes to the Space Academy, where her secretive uncle holds some position of importance. Jax is determined to uncover who destroyed her colony and killed her scientist parents. In an early episode, Jax tags along on an expedition to investigate the attack, and finds a portal, a new extraterrestrial villain and an alien language that she alone can read.

We learn that Earth and Zataria, who recently had a war, have declared an armistice, but tensions still run high and various intelligence agencies predict that a new war between the combatants is on the horizon. Secretive Uncle and his minion Zander discuss the fact that Jax is Pandora, or Pandora is Jax, or something like that. And Jax “must never know” how powerful and dangerous she is.

Strengths:

Pretty People. The CW is always looking for gorgeous youth and they bagged a bevy of them here. They include:

Thomas, the telepath: Thomas, (played by Martin Robb-Semple) is blazingly sexy. He is a good pilot, very studious, and powerfully telepathic.

Atria, the emancipated clone: Raechelle Banna, who plays Atria Nine, a self-emancipated clone (it’s complicated) is more cute than gorgeous, but she is very cute.

Ralan the enemy outcast: Played by Ben Radcliffe, Ralan is the Zatarian exchange student, sent as a diplomatic gesture. He has facial marks and dresses like a Goth in brown. So far, he is my favorite male character.

Pilar the superior one: Bandita Sanduu plays Delaney Pilar as coolly sexy, someone who should be slinking around in a black patent leather catsuit. Pilar has nanite implants and connects to the datastream. Pilar actually occupies the same “type” category as Jax, which I think is a mistake on the show’s part.

Jax who is perfect: Dark-haired, green-eyed Jax is also coolly sexy, depicted by Priscilla Quintana.

Zander the Love Interest: The apparent love interest for Jax (they have zero chemistry, so I’m hoping he’s a fake love interest), Xander is handsomely played by Oliver Dench.

Interesting Relationships:

Assuming this show really is aimed at a slightly younger audience, so far the rivalries and friendships among the students are well done. One nice character already died onscreen to show us that Death is Real. Thomas now distrusts Jax because she used him for her own ends… which is interesting because as near as I can tell, so far, she’s done that to everyone. It was refreshing to see Thomas, at least, call her on it.

Ralan faces divided loyalties because of course he is expected to spy for his father. He was an outcast, facing ostracism among the other members of the freshman class until perfect Jax included him in her circle.

Zander is a good soldier, a junior 007 to Secretive Uncle’s M, but maybe he is starting to question his unthinking loyalty.

The big exception here is Jax and Zander. The story keeps throwing them together and setting up missed connection after missed connection. That could be creating awesome tension, except that Jax and Zander have no chemistry together. None. Ralan and Jax have little chemistry either, but they are both outsiders, and they think much the same way. Seeing them as a couple would be a definite change of pace.

Nice costumes:

Atria Nine wears bright pastels, big jewelry and short skirts. Pilar dresses in longer, sleeker, form-fitting clothes (even though she should be wearing a catsuit) while Jax looks more proletariat in stylist trousers and tunics. They’re all good.

And the show has weaknesses:

World-building:

The science fictional world here is soap-bubble thin. There’s no reason given for the previous war. The extra-dimensional attackers are clearly known to Secretive Uncle, and there is an Evil Corporation called Parallax. “Pandora” is part of some kind of genetic program. It remains to be seen whether Jax is really a “normal” human girl or a longer-lived entity. In Season One, most stories wrap up with only a few clues left to carry forward and address the bigger mysteries, ones like; who blew up the space ship with the remains of the extra-dimensional alien on it, why did Bad Guys find and wipe the “black box” of that ship (aided by a duped Jax and Thomas); what is Pandora, anyway?

The non-existent world-building extends to exteriors and sets. The campus of Space Academy looks like a municipal park. When Atria is abducted and taken back to her home colony that manufactures clones, the sets looks like an off-the-grid farm, complete with a couple of random hay bales, and the clone factory site resembles a milking barn. The show has GCI, and it wouldn’t be that hard to create or find a couple of exteriors to flash up on the screen for a second to “sell” us on a true colony. The same was true of “New Portland.” I honestly did not understand for a while during Episode One that New Portland was an actual colony; I thought Jax’s house and her parent’s scientific outpost got blown up and little else.

No one has told us the size of these so-called colonies. Given the show’s obsessive love of expository dialogue, this should be a no-brainer.

Flat Writing:

Now and then there’s a bit of nice banter, but most of the dialogue is completely the opposite of subtext. (Is there a word for that? Supertext?) People, especially these canny intelligence officers who apparently run the school, just blurt out plot points with zero subtlety. And you could create a drinking game around the number of times Jax says (to someone), “I just need to know what happened to my parents.”

Protagonist-Centered Morality:

Jax: You went out into the asteroid belt and got something. You need to tell me what it was, right now, Zander, or I will continue to bat my green eyes at you.

Zander: The thing we found has implications that would threaten our fragile peace and could lead to the deaths of millions if it were leaked. I’m not going to do that.

Jax: So? Why would I care? There’s about one chance in seven million that whatever you found had something to do with the death of my parents!  I just need to know—”

Zander: [Hands over ears, screaming] Not that again! All right! All right! It’s the flight recorder for that ship that got blown up!

So far, Jax’s self-centeredness and immaturity, while having plot-driving consequences all around her, have never rebounded onto her. I hope this will change, but basically, the show’s message so far is that if Jax wants it, it’s good, regardless of what happens to anyone else. Part of the enjoyment of Thomas’s anger with her is that he is the first person to make her responsible for her irresponsibility, so to speak.

But even there it falls short. Currently, Jax feels shame and responsibility for something she (apparently) did either in a past life, or as herself in a phase of her life (150 years earlier) that she doesn’t remember. However, she doesn’t feel morally conflicted at all at having led a Bad Guy into a top-secret vault so the Bad Guy would wipe the flight recorder’s memory, because the Bad Guy promised to tell her something about her parents.

Misogyny:

Kind of surprising, this one. The main character is a woman, and several of her circle of friends are females. Still, so far the subsidiary villains (double-agents, moles,etc) have been women, and they are boring. The most disappointing episode, though, involved Pilar and her implants. Someone has hacked Pilar’s connection and are messing with her head, including directing her to show up naked in the Black Hole, the school bar and hangout. We’re at the end of the 22nd century, and this is the Space Academy, which plans to educate the future officers, diplomats and leaders of the various inhabited worlds. Despite this, they apparently have no policy on bullying or equality. Nobody goes to Pilar’s aid, they just gape (and take footage); the next morning, when she appears (dressed) in her classroom, everyone laughs. Everyone pulls up 3D video of her naked, including the women. There are no consequences for these students; this is presented as “sad but normal” school behavior. Space Academy doesn’t care about bullying. Also, in spite of the fact that there are many women in the academy, there is obviously still no such thing as equality. Women exist solely as objects of the male gaze; body-shaming is alive and well.

In the episode in which Jax confronts zombies, we watch Thomas judge and shame Atria for her sexual openness. Atria, a clone, was originally enslaved. Before she freed herself, sex was never within her control. Now that she is freed, she is enjoying experimenting, but Thomas wants a monogamous relationship. “I thought I could change you, but I can’t,” he says, and sure enough, by the end of the ep Atria has changed, rebuffing other partners so she can be exclusive with Thomas. The message to young women couldn’t be clearer.

Conclusion:

There’s an appealing cast and I am curious now to see what the deal is with New Portland and Pandora. On the other hand, this show is pretty thin. The end of Season One is coming up; I question whether this one will be renewed. I do wonder if this was an import from the CW’s streaming service, CW Seed. Seed seems to have a different standard of storytelling and production values.

Posted in Movies, Television Tuesday | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Readers’ Favorite

Readers’ Favorite gave Aluminum Leaves a 5-star rating. The reviewer said it was a fantasy “of majestic scale.” Overall, I’m pleased by the generous review, given by a reader who clearly “got” the story.

Readers Favorite exists to connect readers with books. It’s a business. They make their reviews available to the author for posting, they post them on their site and they will do an email push to 500,000 people.

Like many internet businesses, Readers’ Favorite offers services on a sliding scale from free to expensive. You can send your work to them and pay nothing, and your book goes into a pool that reviewers can draw from. They may review it. If they decide to review it, they have 90 days to do so. They only post 4-and-5-star reviews on their site, but they will send the writer a mini-critique of any review they do. If you are looking for a beta-reader and don’t have a writers group, this might be a good place to start. The site advertises that all their reviewers are writers.

You  can also pay $59 for a guaranteed review within two weeks. You are paying for a guaranteed review and for the timeframe, not a positive review. This model is like Kirkus Reviews, where payment is for the act of reviewing, not for a rating.

Your $59 also gets you the email push if you have a 4-or-5-star review. (There are some other internet things, like a “5-star badge” you can put on your website if you get a 5-star review, but I wasn’t terribly interested in that.)

Part of the $59 package gets you a press release written by them, which you can use. You can also pay them to send it out to about 800 sites. They are clear and honest in their write-up that it is unlikely the press release will inspire news outlets to call you and beg for an interview. What it will get you is Google’s attention for its search engine. I haven’t made up my mind yet about the press release. I’d do one myself, but I don’t have 800 contacts.

The best parts are the review, the link on their site and the email push. For me, that alone is worth the money.

They also offer a book contest, but I am wary of contests. I’d steer clear. The hype around the contest makes me skeptical and the entry fee is $99. That’s high. That’s too high. I’d take a hard pass.

Posted in Thoughts about Writing | Leave a comment

The Wand That Rocks the Cradle Available for Pre-Order

The fantasy anthology The Wand that Rocks the Cradle will be out September 15, but it’s available for a Kindle pre-order now.

Mine is one of eight stories about families and magic. Families; they can be your bedrock and your support system, or they can be a place of madness and pain, or they can make you crazy… or any and all of the above. These stories explore the nature of family and the nature of magic.

The tone ranges from humorous (mine, “Bellwethers Know Best” is funny or at least tries to be), sad, dark and thoughtful. I hope you enjoy it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Circus Came to Town

Flynn Creek Circus gave several performances at the Sebastopol Grange. This small family circus works closely with youth circuses and non-profit circus camps. Like most small venues, the focus is on tumbling, ropes and rings, juggling and magic tricks. No non-human animals are part of the show.

The show takes place inside a true circus tent, with seating made up of plastic chairs and garden benches. The VIP seats (first row) are painted red and made a nice statement against the white of the rest of the seats. The show is wheelchair accessible if you let them know when you reserve tickets. Since they usually perform in some sort of field, people using wheelchairs, walkers or other mobility devices need to be aware they’ll be crossing uneven ground.

The show has a story that connects the various acts, a parable called “Out of Hat.” It looks at a magic show from the perspective of the rabbit.

After the band (drummer not shown) is introduced, a very conceited magician struts out onto the stage. For his final trick, he pulls his rabbit, Porkchop out of the hat.

Porkchop is a joyous innocent. He has no memory of where he was before, except that it was dark. He loves all the lights and all the people. When the conceited magician tells the audience that his final trick is putting Porkchop back in the hat, the bunny rebels. He steals the red hat the magician is wearing and hides.

The chase is on! First, Porkchop wants to hide the hat. Before he can find a hiding place, he has to dodge Animal Control, who pursues him on a unicycle. Fortunately, Animal Control is distracted by a flirtatious feline.

The “through story” of Porkchop and the magician is broken up by performances by Kris and Harrison Kremo, “gentlemen” jugglers, by a young woman called The Scientist who pauses to explain the science of circus work, and by two performances of the magicican himself (one a set of card tricks using audience assistance).

The magician sends his two assistants out with carrots to tempt Porkchop, to no avail. Somehow, the braids of the two young women become entwined, turning them into the Two-Headed Girl.

Porkchop is assisted by the Rabbit Revolutionists, who also do a knife-throwing act (the least polished of all the performances. It wasn’t that it was bad; they were simply slightly less proficient than the other performers.).

Porkchop decides that he is no longer going to try to hide the hat. Instead, he will become a magician himself. Porkchop’s Magic Show! He chooses an assistant from the audience, and starts trying to do magic, with hilarious results.

The show takes a slightly darker turn when the conceited magician reappears with a locked chest. The lights shift to blue tones, the music becomes minor-key and ominous and dry ice fog drifts out onto the stage. The magician reveals his muse, who he keeps blindfolded and locked in a box. Not cool, magician!

Before we saw the muse’s act, the magician himself did a rope routine. I was in awe of all these performers. I did notice that the rope routine as performed capitalizes on the performer’s upper body strength. The silks, the ring and the straps seem designed for a performer whose lower body strength is greater.

At the other end of those ropes, lines and silks, by the way, is a troupe member who is holding them to keep you from crashing head-first to the floor. These performances require trust.

But, I was mad at the magician because he kept his muse locked up. Porkchop, who watched this whole situation from hiding, sneaked out and freed the muse. Together the rabbit and the muse cook up a scheme, and turn the tables on that selfish magician!

But not before a teeterboard performance.

This was the general audience show, definitely aimed at children, although there are plenty of laughs and thrills for the adults. (Think vintage Bugs Bunny cartoons.) It wouldn’t be a life show for kids without at least one fart joke, but that one was funny. The woman who performed Porkchop was simply brilliant, as was the man playing the magician… and really, all the performers. Much of this is clowning, not the scary, Stephen-King, red-nose type of clowning we tend to think of and many of us hate. This is closer to being a court jester.

I had some quibbles. You’re inside a big canvas tent. The sound wasn’t great. The musicians handled it okay, but the young woman who played the Scientist was nearly inaudible to me. That was my single biggest complaint.

The cost for an adult was $32. I don’t think that’s outrageous for any live performance these days. The program booklet was an additional $8; that money goes to the circus camp. The VIP seat package, which is $50, includes free cotton candy, one free alcoholic beverage (I think) and a program. Since I planned to skip the cotton candy, that hardly seemed worth the additional $12.

Flynn Creek Circus makes its year-round home in Mendocino County. I’m delighted to see them extending performances into Sonoma County. I really hope they come back next year!

Posted in Around Town, Uncategorized, View from the Road | Leave a comment

So, What is Bookscan, Anyway?

When I set up my author page on Amazon, I discovered that one tool I can now use is NPD Bookscan. Bookscan is an arm of the Neilsen corporation, the same people who used to do television rating (I guess they still do). They provide a similar service for publishers, etc, tracking the sales of books.

In 2010, Amazon started making that information available to writers. Finally, I understand what all those writers are talking about on their blogs! The mysteries stand revealed, arcane no more!

Or… Maybe not.

Bookscan collects data on several “sales tracks.” Various Point of Sale systems interact gracefully with it – including most of the large chain bookstores (and Amazon), but smaller independent bookstores that use a proprietary, homegrown point of sale system, don’t have the staff, time or inclination to add another layer of work just to report. So those sales aren’t counted.

Sales from larger chain brick and mortal stores, and online sales (such as Amazon) are counted, however. It appears ebooks are not.

This article from the Independent Book Publishers Association lists several other areas that do not feed into Bookscan numbers.

  • Wholesale purchases
  • Publishers purchases
  • Purchases by libraries in many cases
  • Conference and bookfair purchases
  • Purchases by nonprofits
  • Purchases of books by “non-book” stores; examples include How-to books that might sell in a nursery, a hardware store or a craft shop.

And apparently WalMart does not report to NDP Bookscan either.

According to Author Central, NDP Bookscan does not report Kindle sales.

In 2015, John Scalzi had some comments to make about Bookscan. Largely, he pointed out the gaps in the data. At that time, Bookscan did not include audiobooks. (I don’t know if they do now, but I doubt it.) When he compared Bookscan data to his publisher’s data, Bookscan was only counting about 2/3 of his sales. They may be improving, or there may be other tools out there for tracking things like audiobooks and e-books.

Amazon’s Author Central provides a nice geographical (national) map, color coded by sales, as well as your “sales ranking” in Amazon. The lower that number is, the better. I was thrilled that Aluminum Leaves broke the 1 million ranking its first week. There were only 998,709 items that sold better than it did!

There is a downside to Amazon’s numbers though, and that is the categories that are sliced and diced so finely as to have nearly zero meaning. Ranking within SFF is reasonable; ranking within Urban Fantasy is also reasonable; I swear, though, sometimes I think they create categories like Books with a Brown Cover Sold on Saturday. Not useful. The categories of SFF and Urban Fantasy/Paranormal (while a stretch) tell me the book is finding its way to the right audience. The risk with Magic Realism, which is a category I’m well-ranked in, is that it may not be the right audience, which will create disappointment. On the other hand, who knows what Amazon thinks “Magic Realism” is? Those just might be fantasy readers who are happy with what they’re getting.

Neither Amazon nor Bookscan is counting my consignment books, which is mainly what I’m selling right now.

When I first looked at Bookscan, I didn’t check my categories carefully. I thought I’d sold 47 copies of Aluminum Leaves. Not so. That figure was an aggregate author figure and when I broke it out by book, most of those sales were for Strange California, in which I have a story. Tellingly, I know of a handful of Aluminum Leaves Kindle sales that do not show, and at least one bookstore order (from a local independent bookstore) that doesn’t show either, so I can see firsthand the gaps in these systems.

I think it’s interesting to watch, and perhaps compare with my royalty statements, which should show book sale as part of the formula.

This is all interesting. It can also be disappointing, if I let it. I want people to read the book. I want them to enjoy the book. And right now, I’m enjoying poking around at this array of data and stuff that I’ve heard people talk about and never seen before. So far, it’s fun and kind of weird.







Posted in Thoughts about Writing | 2 Comments

Girls Burn Brighter, by Shobha Rao

The heart of Shobha Rao’s debut novel is the friendship between two girls, Poornima and Savitha. That friendship and the memory of it nourishes them and gives them dreams. The question is whether it is enough to ensure their physical and spiritual survival.

The book opens with a story about a temple and a grove of trees tended by an old woman. After I finished the last page of Girls Burn Brighter, I turned back to that beginning and read it again. And I’ve read it a couple of times since then.

Poornima’s mother dies of cancer when she is just a teen, leaving her in charge of her brothers and sisters, and caring for her weaver father. Savitha’s father no longer weaves because of arthritis in his fingers; he is an alcoholic but loves his daughter and encourages her to dream. Savitha comes to work for Poornima’s family, and their friendship grows tighter and deeper as the matchmaker and Poornima’s father seek a marriage for Poornima. Dark-skinned Poornima is told constantly that she is undesirable. Really, though, a deep streak of rebellion is also a problem.

Savitha alone tells Poornima she is beautiful. With the money she’s earned, Savitha begins weaving cloth for a wedding sari for Poori, in colors no one else would think of her wearing. She is constantly making plans for Poori to be married to someone nearby, so the friends can visit each other, but a savage act tears the two girls apart, sending them on different trajectories.

Rao’s prose is beautiful. Her attention to small things — rain, yogurt and bananas– make the reader stop and experience those moments; just as we experience the bad moments when life takes the two girls farther and farther from each other. Savitha is the dreamer. While her dreams keep her alive, they do not save her. Poornima is the planner, but her plans can only take her so far.

As a genre reader, I often roll my eyes at the cavalier approach general fiction writers take to plot. Rao’s book is filled with plot. That plot relies heavily on coincidence. Actually, once I set aside my moment of complete disbelief (really, two young women are going to find each other across not one but two crowded continents?) the second part of the book, which involves human trafficking, is believable. It is plausible that a small, tightly-run ring would have this degree of reach. The other young women trapped in this ring behave like people; they are not always heroic, yet they pull together and comfort one another when they can. This is an unsentimental and compassionate view of trafficking victims.

Really, though, Girls Burn Brighter isn’t a thriller and it isn’t plot dependent. The engine of this story is the connection of these two young women, and the suspense is whether the world can contrive to break it.

Girl Burn Brighter is often emotionally difficult to read, but I recommend it for its humanity — good and bad — for Rao’s precise and loving prose and, finally, for the friendship.



Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Launch Party, Thoughts and Photos

I am overcome with appreciation and gratitude for the number of people who turned out for the launch party on Sunday, August 11. It was literally standing room only! While I knew nearly everybody there, three young Coast Guard members, who had dropped into the store the day before, showed up, and two of them got books to be signed!

Margaret Speaker Yuan took most of the photos (because clearly I didn’t). I also borrowed one from Barbara Cromwell after she posting it on Facebook. (Thanks to both of you!)

Every time you do an event, you learn still more about doing events. In this case, I should have thrown a half-dozen ziplock bags into the food bag before we toted it off. And for a crowd getting together at 4:00 pm on a hot August Sunday, there were not a not of wine drinkers. Pelligrino water had lots of takers, though.

And I should have asked a few more people to take photos, because I have none, for instance, of the beautiful and scrumptious chocolate leaves, dusted with edible metallic luster dust, that Betsy Miller brought.


We also got no pictures of the event’s wonderful host, Brandy. Brandy not only opened up her store, publicized the event and set up tables and chairs, she gave me a wonderful introduction!

I read for about 15 minutes, which seemed like a very long time, and I think I only really lost my concentration once, although it was at a really dramatic point in the chapter. For next time at Second Chances, I might recommend that the configuration be flipped so the reader is at the other end of the store from the door.

I stood up to read. I don’t know if this makes a difference or not, but most professional writers do it — most other professional writers do it. I guess sound travels better, and I guess it lends slightly more authority to the process.

The first young Coast Guard guy told me his name was Anthony, but he wanted the book personalized to someone he called “My Fox.” (I’m like, “okay…”) His friend, Wes, said, “Who’s that?”

“That’s my wife. That’s what I call her. She calls me Bundle of Muscles.”

“TMI, Dude,” said Wes.


Jo Weber, the former Department Head of Human Services was always a champion of my creative work, and she came with her mother, Shirle. Karen Fies is the present Department Head of Human Services, and a wonderful friend.

Karen took me aside early in the event. “You have a full house,” she said.

“Well, it’s a small space.”

“You have a full house,” she said, only a little bit sternly.

Brain advised me that Betsy’s chocolate “Aluminum Leaves” were a marketing secret weapon. “If you do any more readings, bring these,” he said. “You’ll sell ten thousand copies.” He may have meant we’d sell ten thousand candies, since they were luxurious and beautiful.

My dear friend Kathleen made it, along with her friend Gabe.


I am overwhelmed by the number of people who took time out of their busy lives to attend this event. Some like, Terry, took one two-hour one-way drive to do so. There is nothing more validating. Thanks to everyone for making it an unforgettable day.

Posted in Thoughts about Writing | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The Launch Party is Today

I’ll just leave this here. Anything I wrote now would be the two-dimensional version of me screaming, “EEEEEEEEEE!” so maybe I’ll write more about it on the other side.

Oh, there was a five-star review on Amazon, though.

Posted in Thoughts about Writing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

MCWC, 2019

The high point of this year’s writing conference was learning that several of my consigned book sold in the conference bookstore. I wheedled the day-one bookstore employee into letting me put out five to start with; that was two more than they recommend. When I came through the bookstore area on Friday, they were down to one copy. “We had a run on yours,” said Bob, the day-two bookstore employee. I was giddy. I said with complete casualness, “I have more in the car.” (Imagine a false trill of laughter following that statement.)

“You do?” he said.

I brought in some more and he changed the number from five to eight. When I went to pick up my books and my earnings, I’d sold seven of them.

Some bad news – I’d misunderstood the deadline and the bookshop, and my money, was gone! Not to panic, I just had to go to the brick-and-mortar store on Sunday to pick up my money and discuss what to do with the remaining book, which I eventually left consigned there.

I assume everyone but me knows how consignment works, but in case you don’t; the store runs the book/object through their system, collects sales tax etc, and takes a percentage of the proceeds off the top. Gallery Bookstore does a 60/40% split (at least for conference-participants) which means the author gets 60% of the charged price for each book sold.

That was not my profit though. I have the feeling when I’m done with this process and figure my profit, I will be sad. In figuring out what I “earned,” I have to look at the cost of the goods sold, which means from my 60% per book I deduct what I paid for the books (at the author-discount rate) and shipping. These first few sales will look better than later ones because I got my author copies thrown into that first batch.

On top of the cost of the books and getting the books, there are other costs like the printing of the postcards I had made up.

I plan to have some books for consignment at Copperfield’s in both Petaluma and Sebastopol later in this month.

But enough about me.

No, wait! It’s all about me. Enough about the book.

The conference is making some changes, modernizing a bit, or probably doing things that are old by now but look like modernizing to me. Scott Sigler, who was my workshop leader, also gave a seminar on using podcasts to make your work available to a larger audience. They continue to expand the discussion of hybrid publishing and self-publishing, and I think they offered two pitch sessions this conference. I’ll never use a pitch session, but I think they are useful and helpful.

The conference continues to offer great food!


The second high point (the second-highest point? Oh, grammar, you are cruel,) was watching my friend Terry Connelly, who won First Place in the short story category of the contest, read from her suspenseful and disturbing short story “The Visitor.”

Nearly on a par with that was my one-on-one consultation with Penguin Random House YA editor Andrew Karre. Andrew will never ever edit or publish something of mine unless he leaves YA, but he was smart and friendly, positive, and shares a certain philosophy with me, which meant I had a great time talking to him and because I showed up a little early we talked a bit beyond the allotted time. I attended his seminar presentation, called, “Fear Not Confusion,” where “fear” is the verb in that sentence. (“Do not fear confusion” does not sound as good.) I liked a thing he said to me, and said again in the seminar, so much that if I ever were going to get a tattoo this would be it: “It’s a novel, not a brochure.”

Shobah Rao, who wrote Girls Burn Brighter, taught the short fiction class. She discussed plot in her seminar. Margaret and I, dyed in the wool genre writers, attended it and spent the first few minutes looking at each other going, “What? Huh?”

Rao’s work is more in the general fiction arena, and general fiction writers do not want to spend time with plot. They want to focus on other things. She started off soothing the group, saying things like, “I know it’s a weird thing to talk about, but every book needs to have one. You can do it, really.” I imagined a public health nurse talking to a group of privileged private high-school students and suggesting they get tested for HIV disease. Seriously, like, “I know it’s uncomfortable talking about it in public, but things to have to happen in your book, and even in a certain order.”

I’m mocking a bit, but then she made us break out the plots of some well-known works, including fairy tales, and it got fun. She took a look at how other people have described plot.

Later I bought her book Girls Burn Brighter and started it. I have to say, while Rao portrayed herself as a plot-newbie: “You mean things have to happen? I don’t just get to hang out with these characters I’ve created and watch them fall in love?” that book has plot for days, starting on page four. It’s not genre-plot, but it there and it is intense and deep and powers the story just as much as the exquisite language. By the way, do not start that book if you have other plans for the day.

It was another good year for me. I may write a couple more short posts about my morning workshop, and the views around Mendocino.

Posted in View from the Road | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Aluminum Leaves is Available on Amazon

The Kindle version and the hardcopy book are both available from Amazon!

These are both pre-orders.

MCWC participants, look for the book at the conference bookstore or order it from the Gallery Bookstore (they’ve already special ordered one!).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment